Pre Employment Screening & Validation Services

1D Mereworth Business centre,
Hermitage Farm, Danns Lane,
Wateringbury, Kent. ME18 5LW

Tel: 01622 817580
Fax: 01622 813675

Secure Screening Logins

Applicant Login

Client Login

Man acquitted of rape loses Supreme Court criminal check case

The qualified teacher, who cannot be named, was found not guilty of a rape in 2011 after a Crown Court trial.
When he applied for a job following his acquittal, details of the allegation and verdict were included in his criminal records certificate.
He claims the reference infringed his right to respect for private life.
On Monday the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal. and ruled that disclosing the man's acquittal was proportionate in the context of his job application.
The court ruled that the chief police officer who had decided to include the information about the acquittal on the criminal check form was justified in doing so.
Tutors 'should face criminal checks'
Criminal record checks ruled 'unlawful'
The man, who is married with children, is a trained teacher but was working as a taxi driver at the time the allegation was made.
It was alleged he had raped someone who had been a passenger in his taxi. He said there had never been any sexual contact and he was found not guilty at trial.
'Unfair stigmatisation'
Following the acquittal, he applied for an Enhanced Criminal Record Certificate (ECRC) - a type of criminal record check for employers, often required for jobs which involve contact with children or vulnerable people.
The ECRC was issued with details of the rape charge and not guilty verdict. The man objected to the information being included, arguing he had not been convicted and that it failed to give a full account of the evidence in the trial.
He said it infringed his right to respect for private and family life, as well as his right to presumption of innocence.
"When I apply for jobs, this rape allegation is disclosed on my CRB and therefore employers will not consider me," the man wrote in a letter in 2011 when he appealed against the criminal record check.
The Court of Appeal ruled against him in 2016, saying it was reasonable and proportionate.
The man appealed again against the ruling and the case went to the Supreme Court.
In its ruling on Monday, the Supreme Court said the information about the charge and acquittal "was in no way secret" and a "matter of public record".
But the court said the issues that the case raised need "further consideration outside the scope of this appeal".
The ruling stated: "We have been shown reports which emphasise the importance of not excluding the convicted from consideration for employment, but they say nothing about the acquitted, who surely deserve greater protection from unfair stigmatisation."
The full article can be seen @

Current News

Supreme Court rejects government appeal on criminal records scheme

Man acquitted of rape loses Supreme Court criminal check case

Criminal record check for Tier 2 UK migrants

New guidance for job applicants implemented in drug and alcohol workplace policy

Right to work checks: Extended criminal liabilities for employers

Criminal Records Checks "Arbitrary" and Unlawful

The Emergence of Continuous Screening: Moving Background Screening From Pre-hire Problem Identification to a Threat Management Tool that Helps to Mitigate Risk

FINRA’s New Background Investigation Rule

Woman Sentenced To Prison For Fingerprint Fraud

Everybody Talks: Data Protection and Social Media

DBS filtering on criminal record certificates

UK financial regulation overhauled

The City's new watchdogs: what you need to know

Employment law 2013: progress on reform

What changes to criminal record checks are coming into effect from September 2012?

Olympic security chaos: depth of G4S security crisis revealed

Yahoo CEO steps down after CV embarrassment

Get Out of My Face(book)! When Pre-Employment Screening Goes Too Far

Social Media use: Issues for employers

Employment Law reforms announced

Court of Appeal guidance on references

Anti-bribery and corruption laws - an international guide

Loss of 26,000 housing records highlights poor state of UK data protection

UK Bribery Act Guidance: Muddy[ing] the Waters

Fake identities makes couple thousands

CBI calls for lower taxes in an 'all-action' Budget

HSBC bats down talk of a move to Hong Kong as it 'prefers the City'

Police chief 'lied on CV'

Radical shake-up of the Criminal Record regime and vetting and barring scheme.

Extra Pay Disclosure for the Four Largest Banks - More to Follow for Other Large Banks?

Workplace Disputes and Employer’s Charter

Comprehensive Spending Review: Job cuts 'will create new North/South divide'

Employment Law changes on 1st October 2010

FSA-Changes to the Remuneration Code

Financial sector pay - the latest instalment

Employment Law under the New Coalition Government

Employment Changes from April 2010

Proposed Reduction of the Gender Pay Gap at European Level

Jefferson Hunt Limited joins International membership of NAPBS (National Association of Professional Background Screeners)

Fraud: honesty is the best policy

CV lies and interview technique | The Apprentice

Pre-employment screening as a critical risk-management tool

Exposed: the fakers behind the CV masks

Industry Quotes

“more than 7.5 million of Britain's 25.3 million working population have misled their potential employer while applying for a job.”

Mori .

Quote of the Week

“"We make a living by what we get, but we make a life by what we give." .”
Winston Churchill

Industry Sectors

Screening Levels

Criminal Records Bureau Logo which links to CRB site National Association of Professional Background Screeners
© Copyright 2017 JH Ltd   Tel: 01622 817580   Email:

Site Map     Privacy Policy     Terms & Conditions