Pre Employment Screening & Validation Services

1D Mereworth Business centre,
Hermitage Farm, Danns Lane,
Wateringbury, Kent. ME18 5LW

Tel: 01622 817580
Fax: 01622 813675
email:


Secure Screening Logins

Applicant Login

Client Login

Pre-employment screening as a critical risk-management tool


In today's competitive economic environment, companies cannot afford to be sidetracked by employee problems such as dishonesty, theft, false CVs, fraud or harassment. Employers have increasingly turned to pre-employment screening as a critical risk-management tool to try and avoid hiring problem employees in the first place.

Statistics obtained from EMPS over October – December 2007, showed:
4% of all checks had criminal records

22% had some financial record

12% had false qualifications

26% of driver's licences could not be verified

The statistics on the consequences of even one bad hire are chilling.

Financial cost

The financial cost to businesses from theft, violence, and false credentials can be enormous. There are other costs that are hard to measure, such as the harm to employee morale or the company's reputation. Industry statistics suggest the cost of even one bad hiring decision can exceed R100 000, taking into account the time spent recruiting, hiring, and training and the amount of time the job is left undone or done badly by an unqualified applicant.

Given the enormous price tag of a bad hiring decision, it is no surprise that employers of all sizes are turning to various tools to boost the effectiveness of their hiring process. The tools run from criminal, credit, honesty and skills testing to specialised interview techniques.

Ultimately, none of these tools has proven effective in weeding out bad candidates, unless used in conjunction with a program of pre-employment background screening to obtain hard facts about a candidate.

Four critical ways

Pre-employment background screening works in four critical ways:
Just having background screening can discourage applicants with something to hide. A person with a criminal record or false CV will simply apply to a company that does not pre-screen.

It limits uncertainty in the hiring process. Although using instinct in the hiring process can be important, basing a decision on hard information is even better.

A screening programme demonstrates that an employer has exercised due diligence, providing a great deal of legal protection in the event of a lawsuit.

Having a screening programme encourages applicants to be especially forthcoming in their interviews.

Checking criminal records is a good example of a pre-screening process that helps promote safe hiring. It is estimated that 10% of job applicants have criminal conviction records relevant to the hiring process; without a screening program, it is a near-statistical certainty that a company is going to hire someone with a criminal record.

Another important tool is CV verification. Job applicants often use their CVs as a marketing tool, but the hiring company can find itself in trouble when CVs exceed the bounds of honesty. It is estimated that up to 30% of CVs contain material falsehoods that pertain to previous employment and education. A professional screening company can verify whether an applicant has the degrees or qualifications claimed. Even if a past employer will not give details about job performance, just verifying the job dates and job title is crucially important. One of the most critical parts of the hiring process is to look for unexplained gaps in employment.

Other tools can include financial background checks (when relevant to the job), ID verification and driver's licence verification.

Common hiring concerns:

Even with all of the advantages of a screening program, many employers still have questions and concerns about implementing background checks. These are the four most commons concerns that employers express:

Is it legal? Employers have an absolute right to conduct lawful pre-employment screening in order to hire the best-qualified candidates. Under that law, the employer first obtains the applicant's written consent to be screened.

Is it cost-effective? A pre-employment screening will typically cost less than the cost of a new employee on his or her first day on the job. That's pocket change compared to the damage one bad hire can cause. In addition, employers typically only screen an applicant if a decision has been made to extend an offer, and not all applicants.

Does it discourage good applicants? Employers who engage in screening do not find that good applicants are deterred. Job applicants have a desire to work with qualified and safe co-workers in a profitable environment. A good candidate understands that background screening is a sound business practice that helps a company's bottom line and is not an invasion of privacy or an intrusion.

Does it delay hiring? No. Background screening is normally done in just 48 to 72 hours. Most of the information needed is not stored in databases. Occasionally there can be delays that are out of anyone's control, such as previous employers who will not return calls.

Number of steps

Furthermore, an organisation that is careful in its hiring practices should find a lower rate of "hits" during background checks. There are a number of steps one should take to ensure safe hiring well before a name is submitted to a background company. These techniques include making it clear your company does background checks in order to weed out bad applicants, knowing the "red flags" to look for in an application, and asking questions in interviews that will filter out problem candidates.

Both employers and applicants have learned that pre-employment screening is an absolute necessity in today's business world. More importantly, they've learned due diligence in hiring is a way to keep companies safe and profitable in today's business environment.

Current News

Criminal record check for Tier 2 UK migrants

New guidance for job applicants implemented in drug and alcohol workplace policy

Right to work checks: Extended criminal liabilities for employers

Criminal Records Checks "Arbitrary" and Unlawful

The Emergence of Continuous Screening: Moving Background Screening From Pre-hire Problem Identification to a Threat Management Tool that Helps to Mitigate Risk

FINRA’s New Background Investigation Rule

Woman Sentenced To Prison For Fingerprint Fraud

Everybody Talks: Data Protection and Social Media

DBS filtering on criminal record certificates

UK financial regulation overhauled

The City's new watchdogs: what you need to know

Employment law 2013: progress on reform

What changes to criminal record checks are coming into effect from September 2012?

Olympic security chaos: depth of G4S security crisis revealed

Yahoo CEO steps down after CV embarrassment

Get Out of My Face(book)! When Pre-Employment Screening Goes Too Far

Social Media use: Issues for employers

Employment Law reforms announced

Court of Appeal guidance on references

Anti-bribery and corruption laws - an international guide

Loss of 26,000 housing records highlights poor state of UK data protection

UK Bribery Act Guidance: Muddy[ing] the Waters

Fake identities makes couple thousands

CBI calls for lower taxes in an 'all-action' Budget

HSBC bats down talk of a move to Hong Kong as it 'prefers the City'

Police chief 'lied on CV'

Radical shake-up of the Criminal Record regime and vetting and barring scheme.

Extra Pay Disclosure for the Four Largest Banks - More to Follow for Other Large Banks?

Workplace Disputes and Employer’s Charter

Comprehensive Spending Review: Job cuts 'will create new North/South divide'

Employment Law changes on 1st October 2010

FSA-Changes to the Remuneration Code

Financial sector pay - the latest instalment

Employment Law under the New Coalition Government

Employment Changes from April 2010

Proposed Reduction of the Gender Pay Gap at European Level

Jefferson Hunt Limited joins International membership of NAPBS (National Association of Professional Background Screeners)

Fraud: honesty is the best policy

CV lies and interview technique | The Apprentice

Pre-employment screening as a critical risk-management tool

Exposed: the fakers behind the CV masks

Industry Quotes


“more than 7.5 million of Britain's 25.3 million working population have misled their potential employer while applying for a job.”

Mori .

Quote of the Week


“"If we did all the things that we are capable of doing, we would literally astound ourselves." Thomas Edison.”
Thomas Edison


Industry Sectors

Screening Levels

Criminal Records Bureau Logo which links to CRB site National Association of Professional Background Screeners
 
© Copyright 2017 JH Ltd   Tel: 01622 817580   Email:

Site Map     Privacy Policy     Terms & Conditions